neighbour uncle talked whatever he wants, but out of respect for his age, we try to avoid giving him the opposite answer as much as possible. As such, my community and I do not take them very seriously. The other day, uncle stood up to speak at an event in the street. We started talking about our speech, clothes, behavior. After talking about everything, he noticed, then immediately turned around and apologized that I didn't mean it like that. But they also knew that people would remember the rest if not the apology. That apology doesn't matter much. As for the question of clothes, we choose the clothes we wear out of choice and not out of pressure. And his sentence was, you are neither a woman nor a man, so don't wear women's clothes. What one should wear and what one should not wear. Who gives the authority to decide this? And why? He summed it up and said, Saree is a symbol of a female slave, so I said so.
If the question is about female slavery, why is this advice to third parties? Why not take up the task of making women aware of this? His words raised questions about his mentality towards third parties in his party. It occurred to me at this point that we question someone's private life in the name of social etiquette and try to free ourselves from it by giving them a social form. All this is because my community is also feeling the pinch of this imposed etiquette. Some people see us as sarcastic because our way of life and expression do not fit into their framework. They seek to usurp our constitutional rights as human beings. Looking to test the limits of our resistance…
Because we want to make them conform to their so-called manners. When things are convincing, but not convincing, parallel questions or questions that seem like original points but are not related to the original point are raised. Because those questions would have hurt you to your core and at the same time you openly resisted, fearing to be exposed. Mainly, this intrusion is due to the rigid male mentality hidden behind the veil of progressivism. Imaginary rapists teach each other etiquette lessons by imagining all the body parts of their fingers. Covering the body is shackled to the mantle of cultural and social commitment, and the pretense of individual freedom is imposed from above. The distinction between good and bad comes originally from manners. So whose responsibility is it to create this etiquette? Who is creating and who is following? This study should be done. Talk about women's freedom (women's freedom does not only apply to women, it is women's freedom) why raise a gathering...?
Male thinkers openly defecate on the streets, urinate, change their clothes, even have sex on the street without women's consent, but then they are men, and it is their basic need that they expect others to look away. At the time of individual freedom in the second group, however, these blind fools will set the rules and beat the drum of manners. The cage of generational female slavery will be broken open and if a woman, if she becomes a human being, starts asking for human rights, her male ego will be violated... this thought makes her mentally crack. Because they care more about male positions of power than civility, but can't even admit it openly...
What to cover, what to keep open, with whom to sit, wake up, sleep, what to wear, how to behave, how to express oneself, should be a personal opinion, but when this personal opinion is imposed on a particular group in the name of customs and culture, the intention behind it is to kill even the human being. It is to make him a slave. He is praised for manners.
Etiquette, manners, culture, principles, ideology change according to time, place and occasion. What fits our manners, not others', then does not fit my definition, so that manner counts as ideological bankruptcy. Seen like that, nudity is a basic, natural and universal and human equality attribute, but our manners do not give us the right to understand, digest, accept it. Because we are used to living as exploiters and exploited. We are not ready to treat each other equally. We don't want to lose our male positions of power, so we put the other guy in a cage, force him to live in a cage, and call it - Etiquette!
.
